As a fan of the potter book series, I'm going to start with my opinion of the movie,and then I'm going to slaughter the adaption. As a movie this was ALMOST amazing.

Jul 25, 2009. Download Harry Potter 4 la coupe de feu FRENCH DVDrip (planete-media. Download T-link Console Software. org) torrent or any other torrent from the Video Movies. Direct download via magnet link. Film Streaming: Regarder Films en Streaming VF HD gratuit, Film streaming, film streaming vk, streaming serie film, series streaming, vk streaming film gratuit.

The special effects (other than the captives under the water) were generally of an excellent standard. The acting of the trio was well above what it has been previously. Especially in the case of Emma Watson, who was initially terrible but has improved with each movie.

Rupert Grint is always a joy to watch. He really is Ron Wealsey for me, despite that fact that hes the same height as Radcliffe. Speaking of Radcliffe, i was exceptionally impressed!

He was brilliant for the most part, but especially during the scenes with Voldemort in the grave yard and when he returned to Hogwarts. However, credit given to those, i have to say that Alan Rickman as Snape is the best! This isn't just because he is my favourite character but i genuinely thought that he was brilliant, particularly during the scene when Harry and Ron keep talking. Dumbledore on the other hand was atrocious. I'm afraid this is where my commentary moves onto slaughtering the adaption. Since when exactly, has Dumbledore ever lost control and shaken Harry.

If this is how he reacts to harry's name being entered, what the hell is he going to do when Harry destroys his office in The Order of the Pheonix. Michael Gambon may be a fine actor but he just isn't Dumbledore.and is it me or did the film lack certain key elements that made the book? Such as the fact that Harry has a parent figure now? When the Thing with Sirius happens in OOTP, the audience wont know anything about him. And the scene with the Dursleys at the beginning was one of the best in the book!

I understand that for the obvious reasons such as time management, certain elements have to be omitted, but this really did take the biscuit. Why alter scenes which arnt vital to the book, such as the way that the first task played out, and then cut what makes the books great. The two things that really wound me up were the way that Sirius appeared in the fire (why the hell they did it like that ill never understand) and the change in who gave Harry the Gillyweed. Those changed really were pointless. When viewed as a movie in its own right the Goblet of Fire is as enjoyable, thrilling and down right scary as the book is, but as an adaption, to be quite honest, it was a let down. It's unfortunate that so much of the book needed to be cut for time and the movie is still nearly 2 1/2 hours long. The rule of movie editing is when you must trim for time you remove the sub-plots.

A lot of story and character development isn't there. But what is there is a great visual treat. If the movie leaves you with questions just read the book or get the audio version on CD. It would have taken a minimum of another half hour to flesh the movie out and that simply wasn't going to be done by a studio whose primary target is a younger audience.

(Note how no studio wants to release an animated film longer than 90 minutes for this reason.) Perhaps Alphonso Curon would have done a better job of cohesion but there really isn't much more that could have been done in the time and the script would have been essentially the same. This movie begs for an extended Lord of the Rings type DVD, another 30 to 60 minutes to give you what was left out for theatrical release. See it and spend the bucks to see it on the big screen.